What about confidentiality between clients?

Memory isolated per client and permissions inherited per person and per source. One client's opinion never becomes another client's answer, and every read is logged.

Does the agent draft on its own?

It drafts from the firm's precedents, with the source of each version cited. Review and signature stay with the lawyer in charge.

We already have a document management system.

The documents stay there. What memory adds is the connection between versions, precedents, owners, and revisions, delivered to the agent at question time.

Industry · Legal · Law Firms · schema_pack: 6 types

Generating a draft is easy; the firm's asset is context.

The firm's own precedents with source and version, policies with owners, and audit ready for when the auditor asks.

Scenario

How context circulates when ValorBrain is in the flow.

01
A new clause retrieves the versions used in earlier contracts, with the originating cases.
02
The agent drafts from the precedent, citing the source of each version.
03
The partner in charge reviews and approves, and the approval is recorded.
04
The rule changes and the curator-nudge points to the internal policy left behind.
05
The review is human: whoever answers for the policy decides what to update.
06
The new version supersedes the previous one, with validity and owner.
07
Privacy policies approved in 2026: the answer is the complete list, with owners and revisions.
08
Each item comes with provenance, from the original source to the version in force.
09
The read log records who consulted what, through which agent.

Schema pack

Schema pack types: cláusula + parecer + precedente + política + revisão + risco

The same mechanism, applied here

Next step

Less starting over. More continuity

Bring a real project. In one conversation we map where context gets lost between the people and agents on your team, and where to start.